Google has added a switch for publishers to opt out of having their websites used as training data for Google's large language model, Bard. This move comes in response to concerns about privacy and the use of AI.
Publishers can now manage whether their sites help improve Bard and Vertex AI generative APIs. This is a significant step forward for transparency and user control.
Bard is a large language model that is trained on a massive dataset of text and code. It can generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer questions in an informative way.
Vertex AI generative APIs are a set of tools that allow developers to build AI applications that can generate text, translate languages, and create other creative content.
By allowing publishers to opt out of having their websites used as training data, Google is giving publishers more control over how their content is used. This is important because Bard and Vertex AI generative APIs can be used to generate content that is similar to the content on publishers' websites.
This move is also a positive step for privacy. By allowing publishers to opt out of having their websites used as training data, Google is helping to protect the privacy of users who visit those websites.
It is still unclear how many publishers will choose to opt out of having their websites used as training data. However, the fact that Google is giving publishers this option is a positive step forward.
Why is this important?
This news is important because it gives publishers more control over how their content is used. It is also a positive step for privacy.
What does it mean for publishers?
Publishers can now choose whether or not their websites are used as training data for Google's large language model, Bard. This means that they have more control over how their content is used and how it could be used to generate new content.
What does it mean for users?
This news is positive for users because it helps to protect their privacy. By allowing publishers to opt out of having their websites used as training data, Google is helping to ensure that users' data is not being used without their consent.
Conclusion
Google's decision to add a switch for publishers to opt out of becoming AI training data is a positive step forward for transparency, user control, and privacy. It remains to be seen how many publishers will choose to opt out, but the fact that Google is giving them this option is a welcome development.
